Plane Scale in Engineering Drawing in Hindi

Type of technical cartoon used to define requirements for engineered items

An applied science drawing is a blazon of technical drawing that is used to convey information about an object. A common employ is to specify the geometry necessary for the construction of a component and is called a particular cartoon. Commonly, a number of drawings are necessary to completely specify even a simple component. The drawings are linked together by a chief cartoon or assembly cartoon which gives the drawing numbers of the subsequent detailed components, quantities required, structure materials and possibly 3D images that can be used to locate private items. Although mostly consisting of pictographic representations, abbreviations and symbols are used for brevity and additional textual explanations may also be provided to convey the necessary information.

The procedure of producing engineering drawings is often referred to as technical cartoon or drafting (draughting).[1] Drawings typically contain multiple views of a component, although additional scratch views may exist added of details for further explanation. Only the information that is a requirement is typically specified. Key information such every bit dimensions is usually only specified in i place on a drawing, avoiding back-up and the possibility of inconsistency. Suitable tolerances are given for critical dimensions to allow the component to exist manufactured and part. More detailed production drawings may exist produced based on the data given in an applied science drawing. Drawings have an information box or title cake containing who drew the drawing, who approved it, units of dimensions, meaning of views, the championship of the cartoon and the drawing number.

History [edit]

Technical drawing has existed since ancient times. Complex technical drawings were fabricated in renaissance times, such as the drawings of Leonardo da Vinci. Modern technology drawing, with its precise conventions of orthographic projection and calibration, arose in French republic at a time when the Industrial Revolution was in its infancy. L. T. C. Rolt's biography of Isambard Kingdom Brunel[2] says of his father, Marc Isambard Brunel, that "It seems fairly sure that Marc'south drawings of his cake-making machinery (in 1799) made a contribution to British engineering technique much greater than the machines they represented. For information technology is safe to assume that he had mastered the art of presenting three-dimensional objects in a 2-dimensional plane which we now call mechanical drawing. It had been evolved by Gaspard Monge of Mezieres in 1765 but had remained a military undercover until 1794 and was therefore unknown in England."[2]

Standardization and disambiguation [edit]

Engineering drawings specify requirements of a component or assembly which tin be complicated. Standards provide rules for their specification and interpretation. Standardization also aids internationalization, because people from different countries who speak dissimilar languages can read the same applied science cartoon, and interpret it the same mode.

One major set of engineering drawing standards is ASME Y14.5 and Y14.5M (most recently revised in 2009). These utilize widely in the The states, although ISO 8015 (Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Fundamentals — Concepts, principles and rules) is at present likewise of import.

In 2011, a new revision of ISO 8015 (Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Fundamentals — Concepts, principles and rules) was published containing the Invocation Principle. This states that, "One time a portion of the ISO geometric product specification (GPS) organisation is invoked in a mechanical engineering production documentation, the entire ISO GPS organisation is invoked." It also goes on to land that marking a drawing "Tolerancing ISO 8015" is optional. The implication of this is that any drawing using ISO symbols can only be interpreted to ISO GPS rules. The only way non to invoke the ISO GPS system is to invoke a national or other standard. United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland, BS 8888 (Technical Product Specification) has undergone of import updates in the 2010s.

Media [edit]

For centuries, until the 1970s, all engineering drawing was washed manually by using pencil and pen on paper or other substrate (e.thousand., vellum, mylar). Since the appearance of figurer-aided design (CAD), engineering drawing has been done more and more than in the electronic medium with each passing decade. Today well-nigh applied science drawing is done with CAD, simply pencil and paper accept not entirely disappeared.

Some of the tools of manual drafting include pencils, pens and their ink, straightedges, T-squares, French curves, triangles, rulers, protractors, dividers, compasses, scales, erasers, and tacks or push pins. (Slide rules used to number amongst the supplies, besides, but present even transmission drafting, when it occurs, benefits from a pocket calculator or its onscreen equivalent.) And of course the tools also include drawing boards (drafting boards) or tables. The English idiom "to go back to the drawing lath", which is a figurative phrase significant to rethink something altogether, was inspired by the literal act of discovering design errors during production and returning to a drawing lath to revise the engineering drawing. Drafting machines are devices that aid transmission drafting by combining drawing boards, straightedges, pantographs, and other tools into one integrated drawing environment. CAD provides their virtual equivalents.

Producing drawings usually involves creating an original that is so reproduced, generating multiple copies to be distributed to the store flooring, vendors, company archives, so on. The classic reproduction methods involved blueish and white appearances (whether white-on-blue or bluish-on-white), which is why engineering drawings were long called, and even today are still often chosen, "blueprints" or "bluelines", fifty-fifty though those terms are anachronistic from a literal perspective, since well-nigh copies of engineering drawings today are made by more modernistic methods (often inkjet or laser printing) that yield black or multicolour lines on white paper. The more generic term "print" is now in common usage in the U.S. to mean any paper re-create of an engineering cartoon. In the case of CAD drawings, the original is the CAD file, and the printouts of that file are the "prints".

Systems of dimensioning and tolerancing [edit]

Almost all applied science drawings (except perhaps reference-just views or initial sketches) communicate non just geometry (shape and location) but also dimensions and tolerances[1] for those characteristics. Several systems of dimensioning and tolerancing have evolved. The simplest dimensioning system just specifies distances between points (such as an object's length or width, or hole center locations). Since the advent of well-developed interchangeable manufacture, these distances take been accompanied past tolerances of the plus-or-minus or min-and-max-limit types. Coordinate dimensioning involves defining all points, lines, planes, and profiles in terms of Cartesian coordinates, with a mutual origin. Coordinate dimensioning was the sole best option until the mail service-Globe War Ii era saw the evolution of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T), which departs from the limitations of coordinate dimensioning (eastward.m., rectangular-only tolerance zones, tolerance stacking) to permit the well-nigh logical tolerancing of both geometry and dimensions (that is, both class [shapes/locations] and sizes).

Common features [edit]

Drawings convey the post-obit disquisitional information:

  • Geometry – the shape of the object; represented as views; how the object will look when it is viewed from various angles, such as front, top, side, etc.
  • Dimensions – the size of the object is captured in accepted units.
  • Tolerances – the allowable variations for each dimension.
  • Textile – represents what the particular is fabricated of.
  • Stop – specifies the surface quality of the particular, functional or cosmetic. For instance, a mass-marketed product commonly requires a much higher surface quality than, say, a component that goes inside industrial machinery.

Line styles and types [edit]

Standard engineering cartoon line types

A multifariousness of line styles graphically stand for physical objects. Types of lines include the following:

  • visible – are continuous lines used to draw edges directly visible from a item angle.
  • hidden – are short-dashed lines that may be used to represent edges that are not directly visible.
  • center – are alternately long- and short-dashed lines that may be used to correspond the axes of circular features.
  • cutting plane – are sparse, medium-dashed lines, or thick alternately long- and double curt-dashed that may be used to define sections for section views.
  • section – are sparse lines in a pattern (design determined by the material being "cut" or "sectioned") used to indicate surfaces in department views resulting from "cutting". Section lines are unremarkably referred to as "cantankerous-hatching".
  • phantom – (non shown) are alternately long- and double brusk-dashed thin lines used to represent a feature or component that is not function of the specified part or assembly. Eastward.g. billet ends that may be used for testing, or the machined production that is the focus of a tooling drawing.

Lines can besides exist classified by a letter classification in which each line is given a letter of the alphabet.

  • Type A lines evidence the outline of the feature of an object. They are the thickest lines on a drawing and washed with a pencil softer than HB.
  • Type B lines are dimension lines and are used for dimensioning, projecting, extending, or leaders. A harder pencil should be used, such equally a 2H pencil.
  • Type C lines are used for breaks when the whole object is not shown. These are freehand drawn and only for short breaks. 2H pencil
  • Blazon D lines are similar to Type C, except these are zigzagged and just for longer breaks. 2H pencil
  • Type E lines signal subconscious outlines of internal features of an object. These are dotted lines. 2H pencil
  • Type F lines are Type E lines, except these are used for drawings in electrotechnology. 2H pencil
  • Blazon G lines are used for centre lines. These are dotted lines, merely a long line of 10–xx mm, then a 1 mm gap, then a small line of 2 mm. 2H pencil
  • Blazon H lines are the same as type Yard, except that every second long line is thicker. These bespeak the cutting plane of an object. 2H pencil
  • Type Thou lines indicate the alternating positions of an object and the line taken by that object. These are drawn with a long line of 10–twenty mm, then a small-scale gap, then a small line of 2 mm, so a gap, so another small line. 2H pencil.

Multiple views and projections [edit]

Paradigm of a part represented in showtime-angle project

Symbols used to define whether a projection is either start-angle (left) or third-bending (right).

Several types of graphical projection compared

Diverse projections and how they are produced

Isometric view of the object shown in the technology drawing below.

In about cases, a single view is not sufficient to show all necessary features, and several views are used. Types of views include the following:

Multiview projection [edit]

A multiview project is a type of orthographic projection that shows the object as it looks from the front, correct, left, top, bottom, or dorsum (eastward.thou. the main views), and is typically positioned relative to each other co-ordinate to the rules of either first-bending or tertiary-bending projection. The origin and vector direction of the projectors (also chosen projection lines) differs, equally explained below.

  • In first-angle projection, the parallel projectors originate as if radiated from behind the viewer and pass through the 3D object to projection a second prototype onto the orthogonal plane behind information technology. The 3D object is projected into 2D "paper" space as if you lot were looking at a radiograph of the object: the pinnacle view is under the front view, the right view is at the left of the front view. First-angle project is the ISO standard and is primarily used in Europe.
  • In 3rd-angle projection, the parallel projectors originate as if radiated from the far side of the object and laissez passer through the 3D object to project a 2nd image onto the orthogonal airplane in front of it. The views of the 3D object are like the panels of a box that envelopes the object, and the panels pivot equally they open up flat into the plane of the drawing.[three] Thus the left view is placed on the left and the pinnacle view on the top; and the features closest to the forepart of the 3D object will announced closest to the front end view in the drawing. Tertiary-angle projection is primarily used in the United States and Canada, where it is the default projection system according to ASME standard ASME Y14.3M.

Until the late 19th century, first-bending projection was the norm in North America besides as Europe;[4] [5] but circa the 1890s, third-angle projection spread throughout the North American engineering and manufacturing communities to the point of becoming a widely followed convention,[4] [5] and it was an ASA standard by the 1950s.[5] Circa World War I, British practise was frequently mixing the use of both project methods.[four]

As shown above, the determination of what surface constitutes the forepart, back, summit, and bottom varies depending on the projection method used.

Not all views are necessarily used.[6] By and large just as many views are used as are necessary to convey all needed information clearly and economically.[7] The front end, top, and right-side views are normally considered the core group of views included by default,[8] but any combination of views may be used depending on the needs of the detail design. In addition to the half-dozen principal views (forepart, dorsum, top, bottom, correct side, left side), any auxiliary views or sections may be included as serve the purposes of part definition and its communication. View lines or department lines (lines with arrows marked "A-A", "B-B", etc.) ascertain the direction and location of viewing or sectioning. Sometimes a note tells the reader in which zone(s) of the cartoon to notice the view or section.

Auxiliary views [edit]

An auxiliary view is an orthographic view that is projected into whatsoever plane other than i of the six chief views.[ix] These views are typically used when an object contains some sort of inclined plane. Using the auxiliary view allows for that inclined plane (and any other meaning features) to be projected in their true size and shape. The true size and shape of whatsoever feature in an applied science cartoon can but be known when the Line of Sight (LOS) is perpendicular to the plane beingness referenced. It is shown like a three-dimensional object. Auxiliary views tend to make utilise of axonometric projection. When existing all past themselves, auxiliary views are sometimes known as pictorials.

Isometric projection [edit]

An isometric project shows the object from angles in which the scales along each axis of the object are equal. Isometric project corresponds to rotation of the object by ± 45° about the vertical axis, followed by rotation of approximately ± 35.264° [= arcsin(tan(30°))] most the horizontal axis starting from an orthographic projection view. "Isometric" comes from the Greek for "aforementioned measure out". Ane of the things that makes isometric drawings so attractive is the ease with which 60° angles tin can exist constructed with only a compass and straightedge.

Isometric projection is a blazon of axonometric project. The other ii types of axonometric project are:

  • Dimetric project
  • Trimetric project

Oblique projection [edit]

An oblique projection is a simple type of graphical projection used for producing pictorial, 2-dimensional images of three-dimensional objects:

  • it projects an image past intersecting parallel rays (projectors)
  • from the 3-dimensional source object with the drawing surface (projection plan).

In both oblique project and orthographic projection, parallel lines of the source object produce parallel lines in the projected paradigm.

Perspective projection [edit]

Perspective is an approximate representation on a flat surface, of an image as it is perceived past the center. The two most feature features of perspective are that objects are drawn:

  • Smaller as their distance from the observer increases
  • Foreshortened: the size of an object's dimensions along the line of sight are relatively shorter than dimensions across the line of sight.

Department Views [edit]

Projected views (either Auxiliary or Multiview) which prove a cross section of the source object along the specified cut airplane. These views are ordinarily used to evidence internal features with more clarity than may be bachelor using regular projections or hidden lines. In assembly drawings, hardware components (e.one thousand. nuts, screws, washers) are typically not sectioned. Section view is a one-half side view of object.

Scale [edit]

Plans are usually "scale drawings", meaning that the plans are drawn at specific ratio relative to the actual size of the place or object. Various scales may be used for different drawings in a prepare. For instance, a floor plan may exist drawn at 1:50 (i:48 or iiv ″ = 1′ 0″) whereas a detailed view may be drawn at 1:25 (1:24 or 12 ″ = one′ 0″). Site plans are often drawn at one:200 or 1:100.

Calibration is a nuanced subject field in the use of engineering drawings. On one paw, it is a general principle of engineering drawings that they are projected using standardized, mathematically certain projection methods and rules. Thus, great endeavor is put into having an technology cartoon accurately draw size, shape, form, aspect ratios between features, and so on. And still, on the other manus, there is another general principle of engineering cartoon that nearly diametrically opposes all this endeavour and intent—that is, the principle that users are not to scale the drawing to infer a dimension not labeled. This stern admonition is ofttimes repeated on drawings, via a boilerplate note in the championship block telling the user, "DO Not SCALE DRAWING."

The explanation for why these two nearly reverse principles tin can coexist is as follows. The first principle—that drawings will exist made so carefully and accurately—serves the prime number goal of why engineering cartoon even exists, which is successfully communicating function definition and credence criteria—including "what the part should await like if you've fabricated information technology correctly." The service of this goal is what creates a drawing that one even could calibration and get an accurate dimension thereby. And thus the great temptation to do so, when a dimension is wanted but was not labeled. The 2d principle—that even though scaling the cartoon will usually piece of work, 1 should nevertheless never practice it—serves several goals, such as enforcing total clarity regarding who has authority to discern blueprint intent, and preventing erroneous scaling of a drawing that was never drawn to calibration to brainstorm with (which is typically labeled "cartoon not to scale" or "scale: NTS"). When a user is forbidden from scaling the drawing, s/he must turn instead to the engineer (for the answers that the scaling would seek), and s/he will never erroneously calibration something that is inherently unable to be accurately scaled.

But in some ways, the advent of the CAD and MBD era challenges these assumptions that were formed many decades ago. When part definition is defined mathematically via a solid model, the assertion that one cannot interrogate the model—the direct analog of "scaling the drawing"—becomes ridiculous; because when function definition is divers this way, it is not possible for a drawing or model to be "non to scale". A 2d pencil cartoon tin can be inaccurately foreshortened and skewed (and thus not to calibration), yet still be a completely valid function definition every bit long as the labeled dimensions are the merely dimensions used, and no scaling of the drawing past the user occurs. This is because what the drawing and labels convey is in reality a symbol of what is wanted, rather than a true replica of information technology. (For example, a sketch of a hole that is conspicuously non round nonetheless accurately defines the office as having a true round hole, as long as the characterization says "10mm DIA", because the "DIA" implicitly but objectively tells the user that the skewed drawn circumvolve is a symbol representing a perfect circle.) Only if a mathematical model—essentially, a vector graphic—is declared to be the official definition of the part, and then any amount of "scaling the drawing" can brand sense; there may nevertheless be an error in the model, in the sense that what was intended is not depicted (modeled); but there tin can be no error of the "not to calibration" type—because the mathematical vectors and curves are replicas, non symbols, of the part features.

Even in dealing with 2D drawings, the manufacturing world has inverse since the days when people paid attention to the scale ratio claimed on the impress, or counted on its accuracy. In the past, prints were plotted on a plotter to exact scale ratios, and the user could know that a line on the drawing 15mm long corresponded to a 30mm part dimension considering the cartoon said "1:2" in the "scale" box of the championship block. Today, in the era of ubiquitous desktop printing, where original drawings or scaled prints are often scanned on a scanner and saved as a PDF file, which is then printed at whatever pct magnification that the user deems handy (such as "fit to paper size"), users have pretty much given up caring what scale ratio is claimed in the "scale" box of the championship block. Which, under the rule of "do not scale drawing", never really did that much for them anyway.

Showing dimensions [edit]

Sizes of drawings [edit]

Sizes of drawings typically comply with either of two unlike standards, ISO (Earth Standard) or ANSI/ASME Y14.ane (American).

The metric drawing sizes stand for to international paper sizes. These developed further refinements in the second half of the twentieth century, when photocopying became cheap. Applied science drawings could be readily doubled (or halved) in size and put on the next larger (or, respectively, smaller) size of newspaper with no waste material of infinite. And the metric technical pens were chosen in sizes then that one could add item or drafting changes with a pen width changing past approximately a factor of the foursquare root of 2. A full prepare of pens would have the following beak sizes: 0.13, 0.eighteen, 0.25, 0.35, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 1.5, and ii.0 mm. Notwithstanding, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) called for four pen widths and fix a colour code for each: 0.25 (white), 0.35 (yellowish), 0.v (brown), 0.7 (blue); these nibs produced lines that related to various text character heights and the ISO paper sizes.

All ISO paper sizes have the same attribute ratio, one to the square root of 2, pregnant that a document designed for any given size can exist enlarged or reduced to whatsoever other size and volition fit perfectly. Given this ease of changing sizes, information technology is of form mutual to copy or print a given certificate on different sizes of paper, specially within a serial, e.g. a drawing on A3 may be enlarged to A2 or reduced to A4.

The U.S. customary "A-size" corresponds to "alphabetic character" size, and "B-size" corresponds to "ledger" or "tabloid" size. At that place were besides once British paper sizes, which went by names rather than alphanumeric designations.

American Guild of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) ANSI/ASME Y14.1, Y14.2, Y14.three, and Y14.5 are commonly referenced standards in the U.S.

Technical lettering [edit]

Technical lettering is the procedure of forming letters, numerals, and other characters in technical cartoon. It is used to depict, or provide detailed specifications for an object. With the goals of legibility and uniformity, styles are standardized and lettering power has niggling relationship to normal writing ability. Engineering science drawings use a Gothic sans-serif script, formed past a serial of brusque strokes. Lower case letters are rare in most drawings of machines. ISO Lettering templates, designed for utilise with technical pens and pencils, and to conform ISO paper sizes, produce lettering characters to an international standard. The stroke thickness is related to the character peak (for example, 2.5mm high characters would have a stroke thickness - pen nib size - of 0.25mm, 3.v would use a 0.35mm pen and and so along). The ISO graphic symbol set (font) has a seriffed one, a barred 7, an open 4, six, and ix, and a round topped iii, that improves legibility when, for example, an A0 drawing has been reduced to A1 or even A3 (and perhaps enlarged back or reproduced/faxed/ microfilmed &c). When CAD drawings became more popular, especially using United states of america American software, such every bit AutoCAD, the nearest font to this ISO standard font was Romantic Simplex (RomanS) - a proprietary shx font) with a manually adjusted width factor (over ride) to get in expect as most to the ISO lettering for the cartoon board. Yet, with the closed four, and arrondi six and nine, romans.shx typeface could be difficult to read in reductions. In more recent revisions of software packages, the TrueType font ISOCPEUR reliably reproduces the original drawing lath lettering stencil style, however, many drawings take switched to the ubiquitous Arial.ttf.

Conventional parts (areas) [edit]

Title block [edit]

Every engineering science cartoon must have a title block.[ten] [11] [12]

The title block (T/B, TB) is an expanse of the drawing that conveys header-type data well-nigh the drawing, such as:

  • Drawing championship (hence the proper name "title block")
  • Cartoon number
  • Part number(s)
  • Name of the design activity (corporation, regime agency, etc.)
  • Identifying code of the design activeness (such as a Cage lawmaking)
  • Accost of the design activity (such equally city, country/province, country)
  • Measurement units of the drawing (for example, inches, millimeters)
  • Default tolerances for dimension callouts where no tolerance is specified
  • Average callouts of general specs
  • Intellectual belongings rights alarm

ISO 7200 specifies the data fields used in title blocks. It standardizes 8 mandatory data fields:[13]

  • Championship (hence the name "title block")
  • Created by (name of draughtsman)
  • Approved by
  • Legal possessor (name of company or organization)
  • Document type
  • Drawing number (same for every canvass of this document, unique for each technical document of the organization)
  • Sheet number and number of sheets (for instance, "Canvass 5/seven")
  • Date of result (when the cartoon was fabricated)

Traditional locations for the championship cake are the bottom right (virtually ordinarily) or the tiptop correct or centre.

Revisions block [edit]

The revisions block (rev block) is a tabulated list of the revisions (versions) of the cartoon, documenting the revision command.

Traditional locations for the revisions block are the height right (nearly commonly) or adjoining the title block in some way.

Side by side assembly [edit]

The next assembly block, often besides referred to as "where used" or sometimes "effectivity block", is a list of higher assemblies where the product on the electric current drawing is used. This block is commonly found adjacent to the title block.

Notes list [edit]

The notes listing provides notes to the user of the drawing, carrying whatever information that the callouts within the field of the drawing did not. Information technology may include general notes, flagnotes, or a mixture of both.

Traditional locations for the notes listing are anywhere along the edges of the field of the drawing.

Full general notes [edit]

General notes (G/N, GN) employ generally to the contents of the cartoon, equally opposed to applying only to certain part numbers or sure surfaces or features.

Flagnotes [edit]

Flagnotes or flag notes (FL, F/N) are notes that apply just where a flagged callout points, such as to particular surfaces, features, or part numbers. Typically the callout includes a flag icon. Some companies phone call such notes "delta notes", and the note number is enclosed inside a triangular symbol (similar to capital delta, Δ). "FL5" (flagnote 5) and "D5" (delta notation 5) are typical ways to abbreviate in ASCII-only contexts.

Field of the drawing [edit]

The field of the drawing (F/D, FD) is the chief body or main area of the cartoon, excluding the title block, rev cake, P/L and and so on

Listing of materials, bill of materials, parts list [edit]

The list of materials (L/1000, LM, LoM), bill of materials (B/One thousand, BM, BoM), or parts list (P/L, PL) is a (ordinarily tabular) list of the materials used to brand a part, and/or the parts used to make an assembly. Information technology may comprise instructions for oestrus handling, finishing, and other processes, for each role number. Sometimes such LoMs or PLs are separate documents from the drawing itself.

Traditional locations for the LoM/BoM are above the title cake, or in a separate document.

Parameter tabulations [edit]

Some drawings call out dimensions with parameter names (that is, variables, such a "A", "B", "C"), so tabulate rows of parameter values for each part number.

Traditional locations for parameter tables, when such tables are used, are floating about the edges of the field of the drawing, either near the title block or elsewhere along the edges of the field.

Views and sections [edit]

Each view or section is a separate prepare of projections, occupying a contiguous portion of the field of the drawing. Usually views and sections are called out with cross-references to specific zones of the field.

Zones [edit]

Often a drawing is divided into zones by an alphanumeric grid, with zone labels forth the margins, such equally A, B, C, D upward the sides and 1,2,3,4,five,6 forth the summit and bottom.[14] Names of zones are thus, for example, A5, D2, or B1. This feature greatly eases discussion of, and reference to, particular areas of the cartoon.

Abbreviations and symbols [edit]

Equally in many technical fields, a wide array of abbreviations and symbols have been developed in applied science drawing during the 20th and 21st centuries. For instance, common cold rolled steel is oft abbreviated as CRS, and diameter is often abbreviated as DIA, D, or ⌀.

Well-nigh engineering drawings are language-contained—words are confined to the title block; symbols are used in place of words elsewhere.[fifteen]

With the advent of computer generated drawings for manufacturing and machining, many symbols have fallen out of common utilize. This poses a problem when attempting to translate an older hand-drawn document that contains obscure elements that cannot be readily referenced in standard education text or control documents such equally ASME and ANSI standards. For instance, ASME Y14.5M 1994 excludes a few elements that convey critical information as contained in older US Navy drawings and aircraft manufacturing drawings of Earth War 2 vintage. Researching the intent and meaning of some symbols tin evidence difficult.

Example [edit]

Example mechanical drawing

Here is an instance of an engineering science drawing (an isometric view of the same object is shown higher up). The different line types are colored for clarity.

  • Black = object line and hatching
  • Red = hidden line
  • Blueish = center line of piece or opening
  • Magenta = phantom line or cutting plane line

Sectional views are indicated past the management of arrows, equally in the example right side.

Legal instruments [edit]

An engineering drawing is a legal certificate (that is, a legal instrument), because it communicates all the needed information almost "what is wanted" to the people who will expend resource turning the idea into a reality. It is thus a part of a contract; the purchase order and the drawing together, equally well every bit any ancillary documents (engineering change orders [ECOs], called-out specs), constitute the contract. Thus, if the resulting production is wrong, the worker or manufacturer are protected from liability equally long equally they have faithfully executed the instructions conveyed by the drawing. If those instructions were wrong, information technology is the mistake of the engineer. Because manufacturing and construction are typically very expensive processes (involving big amounts of capital and payroll), the question of liability for errors has legal implications.

Relationship to model-based definition (MBD/DPD) [edit]

For centuries, technology drawing was the sole method of transferring information from design into manufacture. In recent decades another method has arisen, called model-based definition (MBD) or digital product definition (DPD). In MBD, the information captured by the CAD software app is fed automatically into a CAM app (computer-aided manufacturing), which (with or without postprocessing apps) creates code in other languages such every bit G-lawmaking to exist executed by a CNC car tool (computer numerical control), 3D printer, or (increasingly) a hybrid automobile tool that uses both. Thus today it is frequently the case that the information travels from the mind of the designer into the manufactured component without having ever been codified by an engineering drawing. In MBD, the dataset, not a drawing, is the legal instrument. The term "technical data package" (TDP) is now used to refer to the consummate packet of information (in one medium or some other) that communicates information from design to production (such equally 3D-model datasets, engineering drawings, engineering modify orders (ECOs), spec revisions and addenda, then on).

Information technology still takes CAD/CAM programmers, CNC setup workers, and CNC operators to do manufacturing, every bit well as other people such equally quality assurance staff (inspectors) and logistics staff (for materials handling, shipping-and-receiving, and front role functions). These workers often use drawings in the course of their work that accept been produced from the MBD dataset. When proper procedures are beingness followed, a clear concatenation of precedence is ever documented, such that when a person looks at a drawing, s/he is told by a notation thereon that this drawing is not the governing instrument (because the MBD dataset is). In these cases, the drawing is nonetheless a useful document, although legally information technology is classified as "for reference just", pregnant that if any controversies or discrepancies arise, it is the MBD dataset, not the cartoon, that governs.

Encounter also [edit]

  • Architectural cartoon
  • B. Hick and Sons – Notable collection of early locomotive and steam engine drawings
  • CAD standards
  • Descriptive geometry
  • Certificate management system
  • Applied science drawing symbols
  • Geometric tolerance
  • ISO 128 Technical drawings – General principles of presentation
  • light plot
  • Linear calibration
  • Patent drawing
  • Calibration rulers: architect's calibration and engineer's calibration
  • Specification (technical standard)
  • Structural drawing

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b M. Maitra, Gitin (2000). Practical Engineering Cartoon. 4835/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi - 110002: New Age International (P) Limited, Publishers. pp. ii–5, 183. ISBN81-224-1176-ii. {{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  2. ^ a b Rolt 1957, pp. 29–thirty.
  3. ^ French & Vierck 1953, pp. 99–105
  4. ^ a b c French 1918, p. 78.
  5. ^ a b c French & Vierck 1953, pp. 111–114
  6. ^ French & Vierck 1953, pp. 97–114
  7. ^ French & Vierck 1953, pp. 108–111
  8. ^ French & Vierck 1953, p. 102.
  9. ^ Bertoline, Gary R. Introduction to Graphics Communications for Engineers (quaternary Ed.). New York, NY. 2009
  10. ^ The states Agency of Naval Personnel. "Applied science Assist one & C.". 1969. p. 188.
  11. ^ Andres M. Embuido. "Engineering Aid i & C". 1988. p. vii-10.
  12. ^ "Farm Planners' Applied science Handbook for the Upper Mississippi Region". 1953. p. 2-5.
  13. ^ Farhad Ghorani. "Title Block". 2015.
  14. ^ Paul Munford. "Technical cartoon standards: Grid reference frame".
  15. ^ Brian Griffiths. "Technology Drawing for Manufacture". 2002. p. i and p. 13.

Bibliography [edit]

  • French, Thomas Eastward. (1918), A manual of engineering science drawing for students and draftsmen (second ed.), New York, New York, USA: McGraw-Loma, LCCN 30018430.  : Applied science Drawing (book)
  • French, Thomas E.; Vierck, Charles J. (1953), A transmission of engineering cartoon for students and draftsmen (8th ed.), New York, New York, Us: McGraw-Loma, LCCN 52013455.  : Engineering Drawing (book)
  • Rolt, L.T.C. (1957), Isambard Kingdom Brunel: A Biography, Longmans Green, LCCN 57003475.

Farther reading [edit]

  • Basant Agrawal and C M Agrawal (2013). Engineering science Drawing. Second Edition, McGraw Colina Didactics Republic of india Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. [ane]
  • Paige Davis, Karen Renee Juneau (2000). Engineering Drawing
  • David A. Madsen, Karen Schertz, (2001) Engineering Cartoon & Pattern. Delmar Thomson Learning. [2]
  • Cecil Howard Jensen, Jay D. Helsel, Donald D. Voisinet Computer-aided engineering drawing using AutoCAD.
  • Warren Jacob Luzadder (1959). Fundamentals of engineering science cartoon for technical students and professional.
  • K.A. Parker, F. Pickup (1990) Engineering science Cartoon with Worked Examples.
  • Colin H. Simmons, Dennis E. Maguire Transmission of technology drawing. Elsevier.
  • Cecil Howard Jensen (2001). Interpreting Applied science Drawings.
  • B. Leighton Wellman (1948). Technical Descriptive Geometry. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.

External links [edit]

  • Examples of cubes fatigued in different projections
  • Animated presentation of drawing systems used in technical cartoon (Flash animation) Archived 2011-07-06 at the Wayback Machine
  • Design Handbook: Engineering Cartoon and Sketching, past MIT OpenCourseWare

conyersandeaphs1986.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engineering_drawing

0 Response to "Plane Scale in Engineering Drawing in Hindi"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel